OK, I have a fix for the missing constructor problem. See: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:class_operator#missing_constructors
Allen On Nov 15, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Russell Leggett wrote: > >> ... >> >> As has been said, a missing constructor would not result in the expected >> behavior. I can also imagine other scenarios where the behavior would be >> unusual. > > I agree, there is an issue with missing constructors. Certainly my example > were assume that it would never be missing from objects would be used as > object exemplars. > > It's pretty clear that to solve this (if it is solvable) requires a more > complex definition of the class operator. I'm thinking about that now. You > examples are helpful... > > Allen > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
