2011/12/5 Dmitry Soshnikov <[email protected]> > Just a note. Seems we're going to back to the unstratified API? When long > time ago in that long thread ( > https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2010-October/011912.html) > with `isCall' flag for `get', I was showing a similar example with > `__noSuchProperty__' and `__noSuchMethod__' ( > https://github.com/DmitrySoshnikov/es-laboratory/blob/master/examples/noSuchMethod.js), > you were against such __magicAssignments__ to objects. Though, in my case > those were proxies, created by alternative protocol: `Object.new'. >
Just to make sure I am not misunderstood: no, "we" are not going back to the unstratified API! __noSuchMethod__ remains as unstratified as it ever was. I maintain that the stratified Proxy API is safer than __noSuchMethod__. The above was simply an answer to the question as to whether proxies might provide a way to support __noSuchMethod__ without turning your object into a proxy. They do, but that doesn't make __noSuchMethod__ any more principled. So, FTR, I still prefer using a proxy with a |get| trap over a __noSuchMethod__ hook ;-) Cheers, Tom
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
