From: "Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> > I take it you are simply reiterating the desire for a standard system > provided high entropy object-identity hash that is guaranteed to correspond > to === and is. I agree (though it didn't make it into ES6), but that's the > dual of the question Axel is asking.
If we really need it, I believe that we can still choose to add a standard Object.hash to go along with Object.is, and not break the complexity budget or aspirational schedule. Just my two cents. We had some consensus in 2010 on how such a hash would avoid leaking addresses or partial address order: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2010-July/011489.html /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
