Perfectly fine and what this list is for. Please accept my apology if I seemed to reject things too quickly. We need to give "throw break" and "throw continue" full consideration.
It's funny you should write this (I agree completely) because I often hear people complain that es-discuss is too busy or noisy (it's not compared to many lists I follow). Exploring larger design spaces, doing though experiments based on research and precedent from solid existing languages that are "close" to JS in semantics -- these are welcome here and I gladly put up with some noise to get them. And in the case of this thread, I see very low noise. In any case I don't see how to avoid a bit of noise in general, long with perhaps *many* negative results (which are "good" in science, and which we should remember to avoid going in bad circles), to get the benefits of exploring the larger design space and considering strong precedent. So, onward! /be
|
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
