as a reference could replace "this" for privates and would make even reading code easier ... private(this) as concept is OK but in practice is misleading quite a lot ( looks an invoke unrelated with "unique" current object as argument )
+1 then for private.whatever On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Herby Vojčík <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Herby Vojčík <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> P.S.: I posted another thread with proposal for shortcut for >> private(this), but it still did not reach the list (I see >> private(this) as non-elegant, too). >> >> -1 to private(this) here too ... but specs are outdated so maybe it's >> already private.{definition} in the constructor which imo would look >> more elegant >> > > Exactly that syntax is in my not-yet-on-the-list proposal > (private.whatever instead of private(this).whatever). >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
