Hello,
I think private itself could be used as a shortcut to private(this). It
may look for example like this:
class Foo {
...
leq(other) {
return private.weight <= private(other).weight;
}
...
}
It is not unprecedented, there already is a keyword that represents this
as well as other object in a strange manner (super). So private can also
be such a word.
I don't see any grammatical/parsing/syntanctic problems with this for
the moment. Maybe you find one.
Herby
P.S.: Since it is very similar (and private.foo works everywhere, not
only in constructor), it may be though of to remove 'private foo = bar;'
in constructor in favour of 'private.foo = bar;'. But it is only sort of
afterthought. Also, 'public baz = moo;' could then be changed by simple
'this.baz = moo;' to make code in constructor more akin to code used
everywhere else.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
