Reiterating my support for the reformed object model (ROM): I love how the ROM will finally end the clashes between application data (array elements, entries in objects-as-maps) and program definition (methods, non-method properties). It’s a nice clean-up, with a clear migration strategy.
> Regardless, if we want to ever have a reformed object model where [ ] can be > defined to mean element access we probably shouldn't also depend upon [ ] for > private named property definition considering that any object that redefines > [ ] is going to have to define and probably invoke the private named > elementGet/elementSet methods. @() could take the place of [] for property access, if we allow string operands. -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
