Tom Van Cutsem wrote:
2012/1/23 Herby Vojčík <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
But it gets harder with getters and setters... maybe if there was an
API for simulating proper legacy foo[bar] and foo[bar]=baz,
(Object.get, Object.set?) generic [] could be dropped without much
of a loss.
We'll have Reflect.get and Reflect.set, see
<http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:reflect_api>.
(these are the methods referred to as Object.getProperty and
Object.setProperty that Allen referred to on the object model
reformation wiki page)
Beautiful. Something like that I had in mind.
Another question comes to mind: here and there some light proposals
towards mirror (a la Self, more-or-less) system appear. Would it not be
confusing and/or clashing if Reflect will be along with something like
that? If some mirror API appears or is planned, should it not be
coordinated with Reflect?
Cheers,
Tom
Herby
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
