On 30 January 2012 11:56, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> wrote:
> this was part of what I was trying to get at in using the phrase > "application level semantics". The distinction really isn't very different > from object created via object literals (or any other standard mechanism). > They clearly are ECMAScript objects but because they have arbitrary > properties defined by the application they are not "standard objects". > So, a good example here would be E4X objects? (Ignoring that E4X is a standard, let's pretend they are engine vendor bolt-ons). They have behaviours different from standard ES objects; the first one that pops to mind is that is possible for two E4X objects to be == but not ===. Wes -- Wesley W. Garland Director, Product Development PageMail, Inc. +1 613 542 2787 x 102
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
