On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:51 AM, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Feb 13, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Rick Waldron wrote: >> >> > I speak for myself and my colleagues when I say that we've had our fill >> > of including scripts _just_ for the sake of having a common testing >> > interface. >> >> A reasonable point. OTOH, I wouldn't want to over-engineer. And the larger >> the API, the harder it will be to standardize. I'm thinking maybe just a >> couple bare-bones primitives: >> >> 1. AssertionError <: Error >> 2. assert(x === 12); // throws an AssertionError with a default error >> message >> 3. assert(x === 12, "twelve, supposedly") // throws an AssertionError with >> the given error message > > > Bingo :)
Is this significantly better than console.assert()? jjb > > >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Dave >> > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
