{
a: path(/a2), // yes, path(/a2) is a object
a2: {c: 1, d: path(../b/d)}, // no, path(/b) is a path itself you will
get undefined here.
b: path(/b2), //yes, path(/b2) is a object
b2: {c: path(../a/c), d: 2}, // no path(../a) is a path itself you will
get undefined here.
}
In general, I mean a path will never refer to a object specified by a path.
2012/3/5 Andreas Rossberg <[email protected]>
> On 5 March 2012 13:20, 程劭非 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > JSON.stringfyEx will never produce text like this but JSON.parseEx accept
> > this form.
> >
> > I mean
> > {
> > a:11,
> > b:path(/a)
> > }
> > will act all the same with
> > {
> > a:11,
> > b:11
> > }
>
> Do you expect
>
> {
> a: path(a2),
> a2: {c: 1, d: path(../b/d)},
> b: path(b2),
> b2: {c: path(../a/c), d: 2},
> }
>
> to work? Even ignoring the issue with circularities, you would need to
> do (deep) dependency analysis before initialising individual
> properties.
>
> /Andreas
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
