On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Andreas Rossberg <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'm a little bit confused here. Wasn't arrow syntax "(args) -> expr" > shot down earlier because it is too difficult to parse for both human > and machine? I don't understand how "(args) expr" can possibly be any > better in this regard. (And I don't believe that a mandatory function > name in front, like suggested by Isaac, makes a difference either > way.) > I missed this step as well. I think you guys are just on the same brain wavelength or something. - Russ > > If we are going for any of this (and I'm all for it!), then the arrow > form seems much more readable (even if -- or rather, because -- it is > 2 characters longer). > > /Andreas > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
