On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Herby Vojčík <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > to see the problem various syntaxes can bring, various crazy code samples > should be written in each of them to see if and how hard can they be used, > and how it is readable. > > I created a little gallery of a few code samples written in a few > proposals presented here, it's in https://docs.google.com/** > spreadsheet/ccc?key=**0AtmBA7R8TygwdEdWenc1X210YzIxV**WxfY0NsU0h1cVE<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtmBA7R8TygwdEdWenc1X210YzIxVWxfY0NsU0h1cVE> > . > > Please feel free to edit/add/repair-what-I-did-**wrong. So they can be > compared. > > Herby > > P.S.: From the look of it so far, parenfree ones are hard to read if too > dense, for me the best seems to be (:x) x*x (and not because I proposed it, > it just is most readable for me). > Thanks for putting that together, however, I think it's a little misleading, because I think the majority use case here will be inside of a function call, therefore, it would be more realistic to show that in the examples for each. - Russ
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
