On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Allen, > > In this > stawman<http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:private_names>, > private members are accessed using obj.name, where "name" can be a > private name that is in scope. Why was this strategy abandoned? > This conflates lookup by object key vs. string key and could be incredibly confusing. And what happens when you have a private name locally scoped to the symbol "foo" and a string key "foo"?
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
