On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Domenic Denicola < [email protected]> wrote:
> Just to contribute to this... er... fun-thread... > > My team uses the closure pattern for our "classes" (i.e. no prototype > methods at all), since we value encapsulation. I can't imagine we're alone. > For my own curiosity, can you point me to some examples where you are strategically avoiding the use of the prototype pattern? > So any class solution that doesn't fully incorporate private names (e.g. > by making them awkward via manual Name.create(), etc.) will leave that > audience behind, still using closures and ignoring any new class sugar. > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
