Kevin Smith wrote:
var Blah = BaseClass <| function(){}
Blah.prototype.{
a: function(){},
b: function(){}
}
The point I'm trying to drive home is that the above is no better
(worse, in fact) from a user experience standpoint, than what I have
now. To be blunt, I would not use the above construction - my library's
API is better.
If this would be in the language, would you buy it instead?
BaseClass <| function Blah () {
...
} class { // or "is class" if you like it more
a() {},
b() {}
}
kevin
Herby
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
