I would simply apply same logic we have already for the look ahead ... or you think that would cause problems?
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Lasse Reichstein < [email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Steven L. <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I thought so, too. See [2] from Waldemar ("May 24-26 rough meeting > notes"). > > Specifically, he stated "Lookbehind support is promoted to required > > normative." > > Are there any plans for which kind of look-behind to allow? Literal > only, fixed-length, repetitions of fixed-length, unrestricted or > something else? > > The fallback based RegExp specification doesn't lend itself easily to > unrestricted regexps (unless they are matched backwards instead of > forwards, but I think that's going to be confusing). > > /L > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
