On 20 March 2012 11:14, Herby Vojčík <[email protected]> wrote: > Andreas Rossberg wrote: > >> How about reusing 'new'? >> >> let obj = do { >> let a; >> new { >> get a() {return a}, >> set a()v) {a=v} >> } >> } >> > > Or let. We may allow let have object literals in list of assignments and > return the last item. So "local var for obj literal" scenario could be: > > let obj = do { > let a, { > > get a() {return a}, > set a(v) {a=v} > } > } >
I don't know, that seems to over-stretch the meaning of 'let'. It also clashes syntactically with destructuring. /Andreas
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
