On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]>wrote:

> +1
>
> This is reminiscent of existing bignum/bigint js libs, which is nice
> because anyone that's used that lib will immediately get this
>

sorry, s/that lib/those libs/


> and be able to be productive.
>
> See Also: https://github.com/substack/node-bigint
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Andrew Paprocki <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Herby Vojčík <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I understand lots of apps want "native" int64 as soon as possible
>>>
>>>
>> I would love to see IEEE754r as soon as possible. Being able to represent
>> certain financial calculations accurately and interface with other parts of
>> a working system that use IEEE754r is ideal. I have found very little need
>> for treating full 64-bit values as Numbers within script. (They usually
>> wind up being unique identifiers or keys that can be passed through as
>> hex/strings.) These are just my observations, though.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to