Nothing, the changes are minor: It’s just not based on object literal syntax,
any more (= instead of : and ; instead of ,). And instead of private { foo },
there is now private foo;
On Mar 21, 2012, at 11:28 , Alex Russell wrote:
> AFAICT this is a small variation on what was discussed last summer. What am I
> missing?
>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:39 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>
>> Brendan argued that if you restrict in class declarations what you can do
>> syntactically then basing their syntax on object literals will confuse
>> people. I agree. Based on that and on a recent proposal for a non-braces
>> private syntax, I’ve updated my class declaration proposal:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/1336846
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
