On 22 March 2012 02:35, David Herman <dher...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Follow-up: I've factored out these two alternative approaches, both of
> which I think are defensible.
>
> Grammars:
>
>    http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:modules#syntax


Nice! One question: is there a reason why you not just define

  Program ::= ModuleBody

?

Besides that, you already mentioned my gripes with variant A (pretty much
exactly what Luke said), so I don't have to repeat them. Obviously, that
makes me favour variant B. :)

/Andreas
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to