Regards -- Irakli Gozalishvili Web: http://www.jeditoolkit.com/ On Thursday, 2012-03-22 at 17:09 , Brandon Benvie wrote: > Maye I'm crazy but this seems like IDL in a more JavaScript friendly form. > Not just WebIDL "JavaScript semantics and types friendly", but targeted at > "implementation using JavaScript" which is less friendly and requires Proxy > wrappers for many/most things like dom.js does. Which is a good thing and I > like this. Maybe I misunderstand your comment but this does not requires Proxy wrappers, in fact it uses just a simple monkey patching of prototypes using non-enumerable, unique names under the hood. With private names it can be improved even further. Or alternatively WeakMaps can be used to implement all of this. > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Irakli Gozalishvili <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > I have published a [blog post] about JS [protocol library] that implements > > clojure like polymorphism, which is interesting > > as it solves typical [problems with classes]. From my experiment I got a > > feeling that it may be a much better feet for JS language than classes, so > > I thought it's worth sharing here. > > > > [blog > > post]:http://jeditoolkit.com/2012/03/21/protocol-based-polymorphism.html#post > > > > [protocol library]:https://github.com/Gozala/protocol > > [clojure protocols]:http://clojure.org/Protocols > > [problems with classes]:https://vimeo.com/11236603 > > > > Regards > > -- > > Irakli Gozalishvili > > Web: http://www.jeditoolkit.com/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
