> >Luke Hoban wrote: > > The do expressions serve a separate purpose of changing the meaning of > > return (but not break and continue) > Dave proposed at > https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-March/021000.html > that do expressions be fully TCP compliant. No way to be half-pregnant :-/.
True - I misspoke there. The concern related to break and continue I had in mind was separate from what I noted - it is the issues raised at https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-January/019525.html. But my primary point was just that in Rick's examples, there doesn't appear to be any reliance on TCP at all. Had => supported blocks on the RHS as in the original arrow proposal, all the code samples would be simpler, simply removing the 'do'. I believe this will generally be true too. Luke _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
