Hi Herby,
Thanks for taking a look!
> Only things that bothers me a bit (except the inconsistent new keyword) is
> the potential ambiguity - I can add method to body, but (since I presume
> prototype and static block and fully-blown object initializers (if not, I
> take it back and I do not like it)) also to prototype / static block, as I
> see fit.
>
The idea is that "prototype {}" blocks and "static {}" blocks would work
just like object extension literals, and any duplicate property names would
be dealt with in the same way.
kevin
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
