I like dynamic this. I favor hard-bound lexical |this| for standalone function calls only. Thats where the problems are right now
The (this, ...) syntax seems unnecessarily gnarly - better to just default to using base ref as |this| in a method call - since by now this is expected behavior On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Herby Vojčík <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > this is more a conceptual question post. But first some proposals that > circulated in the list: > > 1. Dynamic-this enabled fat arrow functions. > > (this, ...) => expr > (this, ...) => { body } > > 2. ABC (apply/bind/call) shortcuts. > > thisobj::identifier(...args) // apply > thisobj::identifier // bind > thisobj::identifier(arg, arg, ...) // call > > Now, I like them both. I like this dynamic this being in the language and > things that it allows (ad-hoc methods). Sure it can be used wrong ways, as > everything. > > The question is: is dynamic this liked (in the sense, is it the feature > which we see as valuable and as one we want proudly have in the language) > or is there rather the footgun/no-one-uses-it-right movement for > diminishing its role to strange relic? > > I saw the mixed opinions. > > Herby > ______________________________**_________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
