On Apr 18, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > David Herman wrote: >> *Please*, let's do this right. > This says to me (what I originally expected) that duplicate property name at > any ply in an object pattern should be an early error. > > Anyone disagree?
I'm not sure that the concern about repeated side-effects is very significant given that any property access can have arbitrary side-effects including adding and removing properties from the RHS object. Regardless, making duplicate property names an early error is easy enough and seems to eliminate a potential point of confusion. I'm not necessarily sold on "as" yet. Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
