1- Yes, several time that you mention it, and ++ from me each time
2- I prefer the dot notation rather than Object.extend, even if both are
good
Le 28/04/2012 20:49, Kevin Smith a écrit :
Hi Angus!
1) Kevin et al suggested YAGN call/apply on (non-method)
functions. Here's a pretty neat example where call/apply is a
perfect fit for standalone functions - and would break if replaced
with fat arrows.
https://gist.github.com/2520731
This is a great example. Two points:
1.) In this case, I think it's going to be pretty difficult to prove
that a "dynamic this" arrow function would be any more readable or
"better" than current syntax:
// On what basis is this:
this.initialize = () -> { ... };
// any better than this?
this.initialize = function() { ... };
There are a couple of characters saved, but it's less readable. Why
introduce new syntax for such dubious gain?
2.) For mixin stuff like your example, I think the elegant solution is
"object literal extension" syntax:
https://gist.github.com/2521128
I'm not sure of the status of that syntax, but hopefully it will get
included in ES6.
kevin
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
jCore
Email : [email protected]
Web : www.jcore.fr
Webble : www.webble.it
Extract Widget Mobile : www.extractwidget.com
BlimpMe! : www.blimpme.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
