> Finally, and Axel used ES.next clearly but I used ES6 so I'm clarifying my > own post: value objects are not in ES6. > > Value objects are being prototyped in order to implementor- and user-test, so > they're on the Harmony agenda as a strawman proposal. For SpiderMonkey, I > will avoid exposing them to web content in shipping (not nightly/aurora/beta) > Firefox releases until they are promoted to harmony:proposals status. > > Between value objects, Emscripten, and *JS (http://mbebenita.github.com/Mvm/) > it's an exciting time to be pushing low-level JS performance and language > extensions!
I like that they can be introduced in a stepwise fashion (whenever that may be...): Numbers first, user-defined value object types later. Numbers should complement the binary data proposal nicely. -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
