Agree w/Tobie on both points (consistency btw String and Set/Map, and having it on Array as well). FWIW, prefer `contains` to `has`. -- T.J. Crowder Independent Software Engineer tj / crowder software / com www / crowder software / com
On 20 May 2012 10:46, Tobie Langel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The lack of consistency between the naming of > `String.prototype.contains` and `(Set|Map).prototype.has` bothers me > (a little). > > Both Ruby and Python display consistency for this (through the > `include?` instance method and `in` operator respectively). > > Maybe that's been discussed on the list already (can't find a search > function for the archives, unfortunately). > > If not, may I suggest both methods should be named the same? > > And for extra consistency, an Array.prototype.(contains|has) would > also be a nice addition. > > Thanks for your time, > > --tobie > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
