Claus Reinke wrote:
That is all within the purview of a standard FFI to address. For
instance, the Haskell FFI
You can stop right there. We have one major Haskell implementation.
You mean like there is only one major browser implementation?-)
No, I mean the reverse. How could this have been unclear?
Just because one implementation currently has the most steam,
that doesn't mean that there is only one implementation to consider.
My point is that an FFI for the single definitive implementation of a
programming language is much easier to "standardize" (it is often a
de-facto standard just by virtue of its sole/lead definitive
implementation status) than an FFI for all browser/OS combinations in
play in the market.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
