> Axel Rauschmayer wrote: >> I was under the impression that ECMAScript.next was going to perform arity >> checking. But looking at the proposals and the draft spec, it doesn’t look >> like it. > > How would that work? It's impossible under 1JS. > >> I can see pros and cons either way. I take it that the rationale was to not >> do things too differently(?) It would indeed be weird to perform arity >> checking only in the presence of parameter default values and/or rest >> parameters. Conditionally switching it on (e.g. via a pragma) does seem an >> option, though. > > Don't violate 1JS!
Yeah. I think I’m getting the hang of this. It is still conceivable to add development-time checks via a library (via a special module loader?). -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
