On 31 May 2012 12:52, T.J. Crowder <[email protected]> wrote: > 2. I originally envisioned this as a statement (of course, I was originally > thinking we'd have a new keyword, until the object extension literal > discussion), but it could be an expression; if so, presumably the result of > the expression would be the object.
Note that, if this is an expression, then you are introducing a variant of `do'-expressions through the backdoor (i.e., a way to nest statements into expressions). That is a significant change to the language, so it only is an option if we agree to have `do'. > 4. The leading dot seems, to me, to be more explicit than just having the > first symbol on the left being implicitly a property the object. EIBTI I agree with that. /Andreas _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
