T.J. Crowder wrote:
My point is that the discussion of object extension literals was
clearly headed toward being a new `with`,
No, this is what Dave was objecting to. It's careless to say "new
'with'" if you do not mean dynamic scope, specifically object on the
scope chain. No one meant that, and cascaded (Smalltalk "fluent style")
call chains do not use the scope chain in any proposal.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
