On 5 June 2012 21:30, Irakli Gozalishvili <rfo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just want to (re)express my (and many others) concern about new syntax. > While > Object.extend adds useful feature (Although I think Object.define would be > more appropriate name) I don't think new syntax is really necessary. I do > think that new syntax needs a lot more justification then new semantics. >
Sorry, do you mean the new `Name` object stuff? ( http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:private_name_objects) Or...? Still finding my feet, but not seeing any private stuff in AWB's extension literals (except by association with `Name` objects). -- T.J.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
