Mark S. Miller wrote:
I'm not yet arguing that or the opposite, rather, I'm confused about
what "non-strict-only" means in this context. Actual stacks consist of
a mixture of strict and non-strict activations.
This isn't so in personal projects or even all-homegrown products or
shared projects that eschew "use strict", as Charles wrote.
How would the proposed API deal with that?
Eliding strict frames' arguments, Charles wrote.
I objected that this makes any such stack trace API hard to use in the
large, compared to an information-leaking string-valued .stack approach.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
