On 14 June 2012 11:07, Hemanth H.M <[email protected]> wrote: > No there is no proposal of that I'm aware of in Strawman, just asking the > group if it's useful? >
I can't speak for the group, but I think you'd need to explain it a lot more. :-) What would it return? How does it relate to the existing reflect_api harmony proposal<http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:reflect_api>? How does it differ from something built using Object.keys or for..in? Does it include non-enumerable properties? When you say "attributes," do you mean properties or something else? Not harshing, just trying to understand what you're raising. (Side note: The convention on the list seems to be quote-first and comment below the quote [as above], rather than the other way around [which is gmail's default].) -- T.J.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
