On Mar 23, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Steven Levithan wrote:
> Although this is only a minor convenience since you can do something like
> text.replace(/[-[\]{}()*+?.,\\^$|]/g, "\\$&"), the list of special characters
> is subject to change.
That sounds like another good argument for standardizing.
The only challenge I see is how to fudge the spec enough to mandate that any
extended, non-standard operators that the engine provides should also be
escaped.
Dave
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss