WOW! Ok, thank you. On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote:
> See dherman's http://taskjs.org/ for one way that ES6 will support, but > which requires expliciti 'yield' usage when you "wrap" to make the > preemption point clear. > > /be > > Hemanth H.M wrote: > >> Hello Hackers, >> >> If there was a easy way to wrap an asynchronous in a synchronous API >> would it not be easy? Because we can wrap it that way any API will need to >> accept a callback to return proceed values. >> >> I bit be speaking absolute non sense here, but just felt something like >> that might makes things easier, while I was coding THIS < >> https://github.com/hemanth/**node-rsj/commit/** >> 051c6c45c15e2cebc88dae20b28ffe**3335823335<https://github.com/hemanth/node-rsj/commit/051c6c45c15e2cebc88dae20b28ffe3335823335> >> > >> >> -- >> /'I am what I am because of who we all are'/ >> h3manth.com <http://www.h3manth.com> >> /-- Hemanth HM/ >> ______________________________**_________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> >> > -- *'I am what I am because of who we all are'* h3manth.com <http://www.h3manth.com> *-- Hemanth HM *
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
