On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Erik Arvidsson <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock > <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, I propose that we go with alternative 2. Thoughts? > > It makes me sad to not support $foo. Would it be too confusing to only > support a subset of the identifiers in this form? FWIW, Dart does not > allow identifiers with $ in this form, and requires you to use ${ > jqueryLikes$Signs } when you need "strange" identifiers. > > http://www.dartlang.org/docs/spec/latest/dart-language-specification.html#h.us5hu2wpthk4 I'd have to agree with Erik and say that having EcmaScript not support $identifier substitution as most other languages and frameworks I'm familiar with do, would feel awkward. Especially if it means using 2 additional characters, just to protect against edge-cases.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
