On Thursday, July 5, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> Brendan Eich wrote: > > This upholes the Array forEach (and all other extras) hole-skipping. > > The deck is stacked against for(;;) iteration in my view. > > > > > LOL, "This upholds", of course. > I had hoped this was a clever pun :) Currently, devs expect for-loop and while (assuming common patterns in play here) to be "the expected" way that sparse array holes are exposed -- so from the "give me what I most likely expect" perspective, I agree with the consistency wins argument: for-of should act like for-in Rick > > /be > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
