On Aug 9, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Matthew Robb wrote:
> I'd first like to state that I am extremely interested in having some
> construct for the described intention behind the := operator
>
> Based on the discussion here what comes to mind would be having the following
> instead
>
> Object.assign(obj, {...});
> same as
> obj.{...};
>
> Object.define(obj, {...});
> same as
> obj:{...};
Unfortunately, this would be ambiguous with
label: { /*a block */ };
>
> Specific method names for the Object.* could be decided upon. Would also be
> nice, following the above, to have the following
>
> obj:prop = value;
same here
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
