This is the response I posted to the bugzilla issue:

I would like to see a better motivation present for why this change is 
important.  In particular, it is a deviation from the ECMAScript standard.  
While syntactic extensions to the Date.parse syntax is allowed by the 
specification.  It is not particularly a good idea.  In particular, every time 
a specific implementation adds such a non-standard extension, it creates a 
potential cross-browser interoperability hazard. 

Apparently these extensions are not motivated by a desire to improve 
interoperability as  reference [1] shows that none of Firefox, IE, and Safari 
currently provide these extensions. Chrome apparently does (and also Opera??). 

Finally, I don't understand why a WhatWG document is being used to justify a 
change to an ECMAScript specified function or why the WhatWG is messing with an 
ECMA specification.  If there is a serious proposal to change the ECMAScript 
specification it should be brought to TC39 as a proposal where it would be 
given serious consideration.  But simply bypassing the standards process 
doesn't seem like a very good idea.  In particular, Google is a member of TC39 
and Chrome has apparently implemented these extensions.  Yet as far as I know, 
they have not made a proposal for this extension to TC39. Why not?

Allen

On Sep 17, 2012, at 12:53 AM, LittleQ wrote:

> I made a patch for bug-791320 [1], and somebody ask me to get opinions from 
> this mailing list.
> 
> This patch added support for accepting " " in places where "T" is allowed 
> originally, will it cause any problem.
> 
> for example:
> 
> "2012-12-12T12:12:12" and the derivation(append millisecond or timezone) will 
> be accepted.
> "2012-12-12 12:12:12" will be accepted after this patch
> 
> and these won't be accepted after this modifying:
> 
> "2012-12-12A12:12:12" (A could be replaced by a-zA-Z)
> "2012-12-12-12:12:12"
> "2012-12-12:12:12:12"
> 
> any comment for this fixing?
> 
> Thanks, this is my first patch for firefox :) any advise will be welcome~
> 
> [1] For ISO 8601 syntax, Date.parse should accept " " in places where "T" is 
> allowed.: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791320
> 
> -- 
> {
>     greeting: "Have a nice day!",
>     name: "Colin Su",
>     nickname: "LittleQ",
>     email: "[email protected]",
>     website: "http://about.me/littleq";,
>     title: [
>         ["Genie Capital", "Web Developer"],
>         ["National Chengchi University", "Student", "Computer Science Dept."]
>     ]
> }
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to