Just to know the process better:
For such ideas, who is allowed to write a strawman-page in the wiki?
<noise>
Personally, I would like guards without that magic '::' syntax. Why
reinventing the wheel?
Just allowing/checking optional type's would be great:
var Number|Boolean|Null abc = null;
var String foo = 'bar';
var withoutType = 'yes';
function optType(HTMLElement|String domEl, withoutType='again') {
// Nice lang :)
}
But this is only noise... :)
</noise>
2012/9/24 Dmitry Soshnikov <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> But, getting back to Dmitry's original question. These haven't been
>> accepted as proposal for ES6 and it it is also certainly "too late" for
>> that to happen. Future editions, beyond ES6 is very much open for
>> discussion.
>>
>
> I think it's just the matter of the need. If these optional argument types
> are very needed by devs, then it's probably not a big deal to add them to
> the standard -- after all it's still in the draft, not published (it's just
> a small section on generating the prologue, isn't it?).
>
> If they are not much needed, then even future editions won't be so
> essential in this respect.
>
> Dmitry
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
