Yes, this looks like the same issue. On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > There's an open draft issue here: > > https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653 > > which points out a problem with allowing destructuring assignment forms > like: > > ({ x = "initializer" } = { }); // Identifier followed by an initializer, > not covered by object literal > > but is there not also an issue for the same syntax in destructuring binding > patterns with respect to arrow function parameter lists? > > ({ x = "initializer" }) => {}; // Again, not covered by object literal > > Thanks! > > Kevin > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
-- erik _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
