On Sep 26, 2012, at 6:22 AM, Andreas Rossberg wrote: > On 26 September 2012 15:02, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: >> Let's agree that AssignmentExpression is ok (required for the left-most >> comprehension expression). The main nannying objection was to trying to ban >> = at top level of if and for heads. >> >> If we can settle on this, I'm ok with it given the custom grammar already >> required for if and for in comprehensions. It's not like anyone will truly >> want / need to write comma expressions in heads, as I said yesterday! > > Sounds good to me.
this is also what I favor, AssignmentExpression all around > >> Separate question to you: (for|let|if)+ is what Jason championed, are you on >> board? > > Right, I see no reason to artificially restrict the syntax to specific > cases, especially given that it wouldn't make the expansion any > simpler. So I also favour (for|if)+ or (for|let|if)+ (having let makes > sense, although it probably isn't super important). To me, adding let in combination with multiple ifs feels like a significant extension to what was in the original proposal that was accepted for ES6. It seems like the sort of proposal change that should be presented at a TC39 meeting. Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
