On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sounds good. As an aside, does the symbol in this case provide any function > other than "wrapping" the string itself? Does the symbol carry any > information that the string does not, from the point of view of the script?
No, in this case the results of `Symbol.for` are just a duplicate of the space of strings (just the way interned symbols are in Lisp). -- sam th [email protected] _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
