On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:11 PM, Rick Waldron wrote: > > On Thursday, October 11, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > >> >> express for node already does this, for error handlers: >> >> http://expressjs.com/guide.html#error-handling >> >> express is very popular; #4 on Most Depended Upon packages; #1 on Most >> Starred at npm: >> >> >> This is helpful. So, judgement aside, we can say there is a certain level >> of usage of Function.length out there for overloading based on a function's >> "signature". It seems to me that reporting Function.length as the number of >> formal parameters, minus rest, will be more appropriate for this use case. > > Having trouble finding the resolution, but I'm fairly certain this was > discussed and your suggestion here matches consensus
Previous threads where this topic was discussed: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-June/023277.html https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-August/016361.html https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-September/016417.html There was no consensus to change the current ES6 draft specification for function length. Allen
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
