Yehuda Katz (ph) 718.877.1325
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Yehuda Katz wrote: > >> >> * get/set accessor may have effects on 'set' (see the DOM) but >> only on the receiver object (and unobservably, any children that >> become garbage, e.g. when trimming .length on an array-like). >> >> >> DOM methods like `innerHTML=` seem to violate this particular wording >> (but perhaps not the spirit?) >> > > Definitely the spirit! > > That's one of those "children become garbage" cases, unless I > misunderstand your point. "The receiver" for .innerHTML includes all > descendants. Yeah that makes sense, although the exact side-effects might be more observable with DOM. Relatedly, are we specifically exempting Object.observe and DOM Mutation observers from the "observability" requirement? > > > /be >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
