But then why such "encouragement" https://brendaneich.com/2012/10/harmony-of-dreams-come-true/ ? ( Proxy paragraph )
If __noSuchMethod__ is wrong, what's the point of suggesting a way to simulate it through proxies? Moreover, what's the point to mark it wrong if many developers asked for it? I also remember I have written this a while ago: http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2011/12/please-give-us-back-nosuchmethod.html As result I see Tom's implementation with bound callbacks per property and a freaking slower runtime every time an API would like a fancy noSuchMethod behavior ... just saying :-) br On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Tom Van Cutsem <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/10/24 Yehuda Katz <[email protected]> > >> >> I'm not sure I understand the benefit of making it easy to develop APIs >> where foo.bar() is not roughly equivalent to (x = foo.bar).apply(foo). Am I >> misunderstanding something? >> > > No, that's indeed another way of phrasing it. Proxies don't support > invoke() in part because we didn't want to encourage such APIs. > > Cheers, > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
