Le 26/10/2012 21:29, Mark S. Miller a écrit : > (...) > > #3 as is is unacceptable, because the spec would be inadequate to > reason about the security of a SES-for-ES6. I don't understand why it's the case. Both for built-ins and new syntax, if there is no "caller" nor "arguments" property at all, I don't see how it makes harder to reason about the spec. Is it the inconsistency of some functions having poison pills and others having nothing?
David > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > (...) > > 3) They never get poison pills because new implementor would be > silly enough to associate they legacy features with new syntax. >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
